Do you all remember the individual who wanted to have an armed "Draw Mohamed" contest a couple of months ago, following the shooting at the art exhibit in Texas? At the time, I said that his mixing of firearms with an event designed to attack a religion would not reflect well on the 2nd Amendment, given the fact that it was mixing this important amendment with an attack on a specific group of people. I supported his 1st Amendment right to hold a free speech event but took issue with doing it in a way that would give gun rights advocates a bad image. Now, he is at it, again, only he is talking about arresting a law maker for supporting the Iran nuclear deal: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...nder-article-3-section-3-of-the-constitution/ He goes on to say why he is choosing a city in Michigan for his staging site: His discussion of arresting law makers will already draw plenty of fire from anti-gunners as they link his attitude to gun ownership, in general, but his statement that they are choosing a staging location for its "lax gun laws" certainly will give more ammo to those who would like to disarm us. Previously, I thought he was just an oaf and didn't understand the importance of image to any information campaign. Now, I am suspicious that he is intentionally trying to damage the image associated with gun ownership. I can't help but think that he is an agent provocateur for the anti-gun lobby, who is intentionally trying to damage the image of gun owners. No one can seriously be as boorish as this guy. This behavior has to be intentional.