just wanted to put this out there.. see if anyone can point me in the right direction.. I am not a mechanic just a cheep computer tech that doesn't want to pay a repair shop if i don't have to!
I have a 99 Mazda Protege 1.8 , it has about 120,000 miles on it. My wife was pulling out of a parking lot and the car died out and wouldn't restart.
this is what I've done so far.
Checked fuel pressure, fuel pump is kicking on, the fuel filter is part of the pump..
Replaced spark plugs and made sure it has spark
pulled the timing cover and inspected the timing belt, it looks fine.
if anyone has anymore suggestions it would be appreciated
Sorry left that out... it cranks strong but will not start.. Yes to Gas, battery good, cleaned the battery terminals made sure they were tight.
I used a Gauge to test the pressure, pressure was in the spec with Manuel..my buddy checked all the fuses under the hood with a tester..
seeing as its half ford i also checked the shut off switch under the dash
Is it getting any real SPark??? If the voltage regulator went it will crank and Run that is until you let of the key. Without seeing it Hard to be of any real help.
Sounds like it has something to do with your fuel delivery maybe the fuel injectors. You might want to ask one of the mods or admins to move this to the lounge for ya. Everybody checks out the lounge, and some of them are real good mechanics this seems like its going to be a tricky one to figure out.
check for spark at the spark plug, also if it is getting fuel and no spark the plugs should smell of raw fuel. if no spark it could be the ingnition module or the coil pack.
Sounds like a bad crank sensor to me, or could possibly be a cam sensor. Both of these will casue the vehicle to exhibit the behavior you're speaking of.. Unfortunately there's no effective way to check if the sensor is faulty, only to replace it.
If any of the fuses/main breakers were blown/tripped, you would not have both fuel and spark.
+1 to checking for CELs. Do you have a code scanner?
Sounds like a bad crank sensor to me, or could possibly be a cam sensor. Both of these will casue the vehicle to exhibit the behavior you're speaking of.. Unfortunately there's no effective way to check if the sensor is faulty, only to replace it.
If any of the fuses/main breakers were blown/tripped, you would not have both fuel and spark.
+1 to checking for CELs. Do you have a code scanner?
While I think you're on the right track, it's untrue to say that they can't be checked. I'd get a OBDII scanner that can see the data stream from the computer and see if you have a crank signal. If you don't, I'd try to dig up a wiring diagram of the engine's emission controls and check the cam & crank sensors. They're probably either magnetic or hall effect sensors that can be identified by either a 2 or 3 wire harness connector, respectively. Could also be the throttle position sensor shorted at WOT shutting off the fuel or a shorted coolant sensor telling the computer it's 250° when the engine is cold. Either of those would keep it from starting. Pretty much need to put down the screwdriver and test light and get into the ECM to go any further, IMHO.
Quickest/easiest check for whether it's lack of fuel is to have someone crank it while you spritz starting fluid into the throttle body. If it fires up and runs on starting fluid, it's lack of fuel. If it doesn't, probably not a fuel issue. A test light on the ground side of an injector should flash while cranking if the injectors are working properly.
You looked at the timing belt, did you watch it while the engine is cranked? Had a Dodge once that peeled all the ribs off the belt at the crank, looked fine up top but the belt wasn't turning. If it is turning, watch the underside for missing ribs that could allow it to slip time. Also check the tension, if it's real loose it may have slipped.
Does your car have some sort of factory anti-theft system? If something tripped it it may not be allowing the car to run.
I was actually referring to the O/P being able to check the sensors on his own... not too many people have their own real-time scanning equipment... perhaps I should have phrased that better ^-^
Got it rolling this week, turns out it was the timing belt tensioner, so i swapped out the belt and the tensioner.. up and running!! thanks all for the info
Edit: I didn't think it was the timing belt due to the crank turning, belt was in pretty good shape, but it was only 30 bucks so swapped it out while i was in there
be carefull, With timing tensioners, if they go out.. there is a chance your timing chain will be soon to go also. Doesn't always happen, but I HAVE seen it multiple times. (least with Motorcycles, but bike engines are the same as cars just smaller) Just a FYI.. not saying it will, but it might.
not sure i understand, but like i said.. I replaced both the Belt and the tensioner.. i took my time and was very careful to mark the time, car is running great.. got a lot of performance back.. when the tensioner failed the car was at idle speed. thankfully there was no engine damage.
As far as chain and belt goes.. it was a belt.. my 83 Monte Carlo has a chain :brow:
most timing chains are metal. timing belts are not so they can't be a chain. i replace a timing belt on a lebaron that was a rubber like material with metal "dowels" inserted in the belt and it was inside the engine.
all the cars I've ever had to deal with timing have had chains... so I was speaking from personal experience.
I have never had a timing belt on a car... all motorcycles use chains, so I assumed since I have never encountered a belt on a car (inside the motor) that they were all chains as well... my apologies.
all the cars I've ever had to deal with timing have had chains... so I was speaking from personal experience.
I have never had a timing belt on a car... all motorcycles use chains, so I assumed since I have never encountered a belt on a car (inside the motor) that they were all chains as well... my apologies.
They used be chains [and some may still] but for the most part they are belts and need to be replaced every 100,000 miles. NEVER let one break as it could destroy an engine. Most engines have such a tight tolerence it won't withstand the belt letting go.
mfgs are moving away from belts after losing thier asses on warranty claims from crasher motors. almost all newer OHC engines use internal chains for timing. when they go, though, its catastrophic. dads 02 ranger 4.0L lost the front timing chain and it ended up totalling the engine entirely.
I agree wolverine. In the late 90's, they really tightened up the tollerances on the 4.0l. now when the chain goes, normally the whole engine goes.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Hi-Point Firearms Forums
1.3M posts
29.2K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to Hi-point firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!