Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner
1 - 20 of 28 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,015 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Has HP (or anyone here) considered a HP carbine in 223/556? I don't recall seeing any posts on the subject.

What would it be called, the HP 22395, 55695 (sound like zipcodes!), AR95???

A monkey gun in 223 would be cool.
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
28,421 Posts
The question gets asked here occasionally, especially in "the official wish list" thread.

The short version is that 5.56/.223 wouldn't work well with Hi Point's strong suit, the Simple Blowback (think of it as "Mass Delayed Blowback") and the market is already saturated with low cost Direct Impingement ARs.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
I think I wouldn’t buy one even if they made it. Zamak and the AR aren’t a good match, and besides…why would I want a single stack AR?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,015 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Hadn’t thought about the blowback feature of the current carbines, I wonder how a .223 would do? What’s the difference in energy between a .223 and a .40???

As far as zamak, I can see where a little more strength might be need but if they made a .223 receiver they might as well make it to hold a 30rnd mag too.

anyway, food for thought. I’m sure some HP rep shows up here from time to time so maybe it’s something they could kick around.
 

· Resident PITA
Joined
·
16,285 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
Hadn’t thought about the blowback feature of the current carbines, I wonder how a .223 would do? What’s the difference in energy between a .223 and a .40???

As far as zamak, I can see where a little more strength might be need but if they made a .223 receiver they might as well make it to hold a 30rnd mag too.
Pressure is about 35,000 psi, vs 55,000, so the difference is about 20,000 psi, or about 57% more kaboom in the 223.
Energy is about 450-500 ft lbs in the 40, versus 1,000 to 1,400 in the .223, or about 65% more oomph at the muzzle.

A “little more” strength? Ummmm….yeah, sure…..that’s right.

As for 30 round mags….they haven’t been able to make 12 round mags work in a gun yet; at least not to sell. Someone else had to design the 20 rounder.

Don’t hold your breath, brother.😉
 
  • Haha
Reactions: moona11

· King of you Monkeys
Up down
Joined
·
21,885 Posts
Pressure is about 35,000 psi, vs 55,000, so the difference is about 20,000 psi, or about 57% more kaboom in the 223.
Energy is about 450-500 ft lbs in the 40, versus 1,000 to 1,400 in the .223, or about 65% more oomph at the muzzle.

A “little more” strength? Ummmm….yeah, sure…..that’s right.

As for 30 round mags….they haven’t been able to make 12 round mags work in a gun yet; at least not to sell. Someone else had to design the 20 rounder.

Don’t hold your breath, brother.😉
What about 30/30? And a banana clip.
 

· Premium Member
If I have it, I shoot it.
Joined
·
942 Posts
What about a 5.7x28? That would make for a sweet little gun for HP. Would this round be workable for a blowback action?

Since we've gotten off track from the original question.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
What about a 5.7x28? That would make for a sweet little gun for HP. Would this round be workable for a blowback action?

Since we've gotten off track from the original question.
At over 50,000 psi…I doubt it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
75 Posts
Hadn’t thought about the blowback feature of the current carbines, I wonder how a .223 would do? What’s the difference in energy between a .223 and a .40???

As far as zamak, I can see where a little more strength might be need but if they made a .223 receiver they might as well make it to hold a 30rnd mag too.

anyway, food for thought. I’m sure some HP rep shows up here from time to time so maybe it’s something they could kick around.
The problem is not the strength of the bolt, chamber, or receiver, but with the brass casing, which is the weakest link, and what happens when you fire the thing. When you fire a round the brass expands in the chamber, but it is the chamber and breach face that keeps the brass from blowing up until the bullet leaves the barrel and the pressure drops to a safe level and the case can be extracted.

While most firearms have some sort of locking mechanism to hold the breach and barrel together until the bullet is out of the other end of the barrel, a simple blowback gun relies on having a heavy bolt to slow things down, where a higher powered cartridge will require a heavier bolt, which can be done on some designs, but you'll find yourself with something that is impractically heavy. I'm sure you know someone who considers the weight of a Hi Point to be excessive since they don't understand the basic operation and why it is what it is.

FWIW, among the things that always comes up in the Ruger forums is the desire for a PC Carbine in 10mm, but the problem is the receiver on the things is too small to put a heavy enough bolt in it for the higher pressure cartridge.
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
28,421 Posts
If not in 223/556, then maybe .30 carbine??? IMO 30 carbine needs to be resurrected to a more popular status, just to bring down the cost of ammo for my M1 :ROFLMAO:
The length of the cartridge might make it incompatible with the x95TS design.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
The length of the cartridge might make it incompatible with the x95TS design.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
EVERYTHING about the 30 carbine is incompatible with the HP carbines’ designs. Length, velocity and potential bolt thrust and all the other things involved. Except maybe pressure…that’s not too bad.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
10,698 Posts
What about a 5.7x28? That would make for a sweet little gun for HP. Would this round be workable for a blowback action?

Since we've gotten off track from the original question.
I hear the distant sound of…KABOOM!
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
10,698 Posts
FWIW, among the things that always comes up in the Ruger forums is the desire for a PC Carbine in 10mm, but the problem is the receiver on the things is too small to put a heavy enough bolt in it for the higher pressure cartridge.
Not exactly accurate.
Dimensionally the 10mm will fit (as will the 45 ACP). But Ruger has no plans to make them. The response I got back from Ruger when I asked the question was it would be "impractically heavy". The Hi Point 9mm carbine weighs 7 pounds, the 10mm version is almost a pound heavier.

The Ruger PC Carbine is only a couple ounces lighter, and both the Hi Point and Ruger pistol caliber carbines are heavy. Compare them to the 30 Carbine mentioned earlier. It weighs just over 5 pounds.

Ruger did say there was a lot of customer interest in a 10mm carbine. Just maybe they can come up with a delayed blowback or something. Wonder how their 1911 10mm sales are doing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rerun

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
My moms husband has his dad’s commercial Universal M1 carbine, he was showing his guns to me….I had forgotten how light those things are.
Sweet little units, really.

It’s funny that the 10 mm is only listed at 33,000 PSI, while the 30 carbine is up at 40,000. Imagine what the 10 mm could do at that higher pressure! It would challenge the 460 Rowland in velocity, and could overlap a few of the lighter bullet loadings pretty well.

I honestly see no reason for the Ruger carbine to be overbuilt for 10 mm, other than stupid people reloads, and lawyers. Sad, really.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
4,071 Posts
CMMG has been doing something interesting with their 9mm AR bolt systems... radial delayed blowback I believe its called? Perhaps it would be more useful for the 10mm round in an AR platform, or also, the .30 carbine round in said platform. As for 5.56 Hi Point. LOL NO. There's a glut of affordable ARs out there compared to PCCs. The only reasons PCCs are popular is because the pistol ammo is cheap and usually easier to find than rifle caliber ammo in the light of recent shortages :rolleyes:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
CMMG has been doing something interesting with their 9mm AR bolt systems... radial delayed blowback I believe its called? Perhaps it would be more useful for the 10mm round in an AR platform, or also, the .30 carbine round in said platform. As for 5.56 Hi Point. LOL NO. There's a glut of affordable ARs out there compared to PCCs. The only reasons PCCs are popular is because the pistol ammo is cheap and usually easier to find than rifle caliber ammo in the light of recent shortages :rolleyes:
I bought my Hi-Point purely because of the price of the ammo and the rifle. It is by far the cheapest centerfire rifle you can have. I already had a S&W AR 15 before I bought my Hi-Point carbine.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
37,334 Posts
Just curious I can understand Hi Point or Ruger not wanting to make a carbine in 223 due to the abundance of AR-15's
on the market today, but would it be feasible to make one in 38 spl.
It’s feasible, but the rimmed round could cause problems with feeding from the mag.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
Top