Bloomberg's Softer words for gun control

Discussion in '2nd Amendment' started by ArmyScout, May 20, 2014.

  1. ArmyScout

    ArmyScout Supporting Member

    3,960
    279
    IL
  2. lklawson

    lklawson Staff Member

    He'll fool some, just like when Clitton running for POTUS called him self a "New Democrat." But it'll only fool those who want to be fooled.

    Peace favor your sword,
    Kirk
     

  3. RobbK

    RobbK Member

    451
    1
    tyranny by any other name is just as evil.
     
  4. bscar

    bscar Supporting Member

    Reasonable background checks?
    How are "reasonable" checks any different than our current checks?
     
  5. Bamaboy

    Bamaboy Member

    1,071
    0
    It doesn't matter how soft you speak when your attacking another person's God given Rights and forcing your will on them and it doesn't keep then any safer.
    Asshat Bberg is just trying to win over anyone not on his side and make us gun owners sound like the angry voices in the unwanted gun banning discussion.
    You see since we all know its our God Given right to have firearms and we all know that Bburg ain't God then we all know there's nothing to talk about.....sad thing is Bburg can't sleep at night knowing some poor person has a firearm and a vote!
     
  6. Maybe a reasonable check is one that is that same as the one now, but removes the NFA classification and Hughes amendment? Plus the check part sunsets in 1 year and can't be put back into effect for 30 years nor can the NFA or Hughes amendment ever be reinstated.

    As a compromise, I would go to 29 years and 7 months. But no sooner than that.