Joined
·
1,057 Posts
What would be your choice? Kel-Tec P-9, P-11 or Taurus Mil Pro 111? Why?
+1I had a pt140 and it was a great gun. Your talking a big size difference though. The keltec is more of a pocket gun where as the Taurus would need to be in some sort of concealed holster.
Not sure I really understand your thoughts as the MilPro 111 is only 1/4" longer and 1/4" wider. This is from both websites specs.I had a pt140 and it was a great gun. Your talking a big size difference though. The keltec is more of a pocket gun where as the Taurus would need to be in some sort of concealed holster.
Yeah, just saw one at a pawn shop last week. Think I want something with more of a track record.
Have you held them? The keltec seemed so much smaller and lighter to me.Not sure I really understand your thoughts as the MilPro 111 is only 1/4" longer and 1/4" wider. This is from both websites specs.I had a pt140 and it was a great gun. Your talking a big size difference though. The keltec is more of a pocket gun where as the Taurus would need to be in some sort of concealed holster.
THANKS, I'll for sure check it out.If I might make a suggestion?
http://www.gunblast.com/Taurus-PT709.htm
bout the same size as a PF9 and about the same price to. I haven't owned any but i'd like to eventually get a small 9mm and I'd prolly go with the PT709, looks pretty neat.
Why stay away from the P11. I have a P11 and it has been totally reliable.I don't have any experience with the Taurus. I'd stay away from the P-11 if I was you, but the PF9 is a great gun and I can highly recommend that one.