In fairness, Ruger may copy, but they also normally improve a great deal. Case in point would be the LCP over the P3AT, world of difference in fit, finish, and QC. To that point, given that the SR-22 is more reliable copy of the Walther P22, I wouldn't be opposed to Ruger offering an SR-22 style pistol in .25, that seems doable, even if .25 was a dying cartridge until COVID hit.Thats would be a tough one. The rim on the 25acp sucks up some mag space. 13 or 14rds is probably doable. Either way the mag will need to be ribbed on the sides like the beretta 81 32acp magazine as apposed to the 380. Doubtful it will happen unless Keltec gets involved and they seem to be just finding ways to make things more fragile. Ruger just copies everyone else these days. I wish remington could have gotten their act together because they were doing some neat pistols that probably would have worked themselves out eventually. I am really curious who bought all the pistol tooling for the remington pistols. It would be nice if someone kept making them.
Firearms market has become so non creative and stale over the years there really isnt anything that interesting. Everything is just a glock knock off or a Keltec clone of some sort. So much for innovation.
I agree though, we need new blood in the small caliber pistol market. Gun sales and ownership have become such a massive economy that handguns are treated as a commodity now, like wheel bearings and windshield wipers, there's little incentive to innovate because what you make will sell (often above MSRP) so it makes little sense to take too much risk and invest in R&D for next step concepts. When there is innovation (e.g. the FK BRNO) it's far too expensive for the average consumer to enjoy... bummer, in my opinion.