Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner
1 - 20 of 47 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Well Obama is wanting you to turn in any one sending you an email on health care that sounds "fishy". Ok every one that voted for this guy kick yourself in the arse ten times every morning. Welcome to the police state, its your fault. Yeah I know its like making fun of retarded kids but I really cant help but laugh as you guys defend this.

Oh BTW is that your neighbor watching you? I wonder who she is calling? Think I will turn myself in and just get it over with lol.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,722 Posts
Sorry Rhodes what ? I was just sending an email off Big Brother about you....er I mean me...er no ShooterZ...ah hell with it I'll just paste the address of this forum...and they can look. Thats right were "fishy" Big O...and we're armed. :devilsidesmile:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Heh they already are looking...ever wonder why I dont post pics of my rifles?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
177 Posts
I was hoping someone would post a thread on this today. Just so you know I'm reporting myself.. It's my guilty conscience, you know for not agreeing with the King and his decisions. :devilsidesmile:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
177 Posts
lol he'd have a hayday with this forum. I'm sure most of us are already on some sort of list anyway.

Obama, if you or your minions are reading this, please proceed to rape yourself.
I love it! I think they have their minds on other things though. My hi-point is loaded but I keep a healthy stock of KY just in case they have more people than I have ammo. :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Get job!

This just in ... apparently the Obama administration has violated a US code or two by even requesting the information and now cannot delete it without violating another.

God at least Carter took a year or two before he fouled up this badly. I havent laughed this much in a while.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,861 Posts
Turn in every Obama supporting socialist you know, the granola eaters, the tree huggers, the prius drivers, the flower children, the pot smokers and dopers, turn them all in, I agree, I am making my list and checking it twice, they are all fishy to me.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,232 Posts
Welcome to the police state, its your fault.
Well, its not a police state yet. A police state would be like if you sent a fishy email and someone showed up on your doorstep to 'disappear' you. I think you could say, "We are well on our way to a police state". Overstating the facts just discredits an otherwise valid point.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Wasnt a link but from a former federal judge on the radio talking about it haven't had the time to goggle (hint hint)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Violates the Privacy Act of 1974 to collect and the Presidential Records Act requires them not to be deleted.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
602 Posts
Violates the Privacy Act of 1974 to collect and the Presidential Records Act requires them not to be deleted.
Neither of those "laws" stopped the last administration from making deals with phone companies to listen in on domestic calls, and they deleted thousands ( I don't believe the millions claim) of e-mails.

Everyone pretty much left that sleeping dog alone so far. Why should they bother harping this administration over it?
If your gonna "cry foul" on one, you have to on both.

Obama will just cover everyone under executive priviledge just like Bush did. Once the precedents are in place, they are fair game. Right?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,232 Posts
Violates the Privacy Act of 1974 to collect and the Presidential Records Act requires them not to be deleted.
Neither of those "laws" stopped the last administration from making deals with phone companies to listen in on domestic calls, and they deleted thousands ( I don't believe the millions claim) of e-mails.

Everyone pretty much left that sleeping dog alone so far. Why should they bother harping this administration over it?
If your gonna "cry foul" on one, you have to on both.

Obama will just cover everyone under executive priviledge just like Bush did. Once the precedents are in place, they are fair game. Right?
i don't think Rhodes would defend the actions of the last administration on that point. but you do bring up an excellent point, if the last administration got away with it, there's no reason to believe that this administration will be any different. not that its right, but its just the way it is.
 
1 - 20 of 47 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top