Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,095 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/25/AR2009092500289_pf.html

PITTSBURGH, Sept. 25 -- President Obama and the leaders of France and Britain on Friday blasted Iran's construction of a previously unknown uranium enrichment facility and demanded that Tehran immediately fulfill its obligations under international law or risk the imposition of harsh new sanctions.

"Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow," Obama said, detailing how the facility at Qom had been under construction for years without being disclosed, as required, to the International Atomic Energy Association. "International law is not an empty promise."

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown accused Iran of "serial deception" that he said "will shock and anger the whole international community, and it will harden our resolve."

"We will not let this matter rest," Brown said. " . . . Iran must abandon any military ambitions for its nuclear programs."

Iran acknowledged the existence of the facility for the first time on Monday, in a letter to the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency. The letter said "a new pilot fuel enrichment plant is under construction in the country," said Marc Vidricaire, a spokesman for the watchdog agency. "The letter stated that the enrichment level would be up to 5 percent."

Vidricaire said the agency responded by asking Iran to quickly provide more specifics about the facility -- "to assess safeguards verification requirements." He said Iran told the IAEA "that no nuclear material has been introduced into the facility."

White House officials said Western intelligence agencies have been tracking the facility for years. Obama said officials from the United States, France and Britain briefed the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday on what they knew about the facility. The three heads of state decided to publicly disclose the existence of the facility after learning that Iran had become aware the site was no longer a secret.

Iran's report of the facility's existence -- and Obama's plans to accuse Tehran of hiding it -- were first reported Friday by the New York Times.

Obama, Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy spoke in advance of the opening of the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh. Their remarks came a day after Obama chaired a United Nations Security Council session on halting the spread of nuclear weapons throughout the world. Although Obama referred to the nuclear ambitions of both Iran and North Korea during the Security Council session, diplomatic maneuvering kept any mention of the two countries out of a resolution that the council unanimously approved. The omission prompted passionate criticism from Sarkozy.

"How, before the eyes of the world, could we justify meeting without tackling them?" Sarkozy said. "We live in the real world, not a virtual world. And the real world expects us to take decisions."

On Friday, he said Iran "is taking the international community on a dangerous path . . . Everything, everything, must be put on the table now. We cannot let the Iranian leaders gain time while the motors are running."

Both Sarkozy and Brown said that if Iran does not come into compliance by December, it risks the imposition of stringent international sanctions. Obama, who spoke in more measured terms, did not mention sanctions specifically.

The global standoff over Iran's nuclear program began in 2002 with the discovery of two large nuclear facilities in Natanz and Arak, with the Natanz facility devoted to uranium enrichment. U.S. intelligence had secretly provided the geographical coordinates of the facilities to the IAEA three months before an Iranian exile group drew attention to the facilities at an August news conference in Washington.

The public exposure led to demands that IAEA inspect the facilities, which it did in 2003, and ultimately to Iran's admission that it had kept its nuclear program hidden for 18 years in violation of an international treaty.

A key question regarding the Qom site is whether Iran violated its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty regarding when it has to inform international authorities of a new nuclear facility. Under the original treaty, such declarations were not required until six months before fuel was introduced into the facility.

In 1992, however, the IAEA board determined that six months was not enough time to organize required inspections, and amended the rule to require nations to inform it at the time the initial decision was made to build a facility, before construction began. The amendment, called "Code 3.1," was mandatory; Iran and all other signatories agreed to it.

But in 2006, angered over an IAEA decision to refer its case to the U.N. Security Council, Iran said its parliament had decided it would revert to the non-amended treaty and six-month notification.

The IAEA took the position that no country could legally revert to the old system, and that Iran and all countries were bound by the new rule.

"This is not the first time that Iran has concealed information about its nuclear program," Obama said Friday morning. "The size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program."

Obama and other Western leaders have been trying to increase pressure on Iran to disclose more about its nuclear ambitions in advance of international talks next week about Iran's nuclear program. On Oct. 1, a senior Iranian diplomat will meet counterparts from the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany in Geneva.

"We expect a serious response from Iran," during the talks, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said this week in a statement approved by the six nations. If such a response is not forthcoming, he said, the six nations will decide on "next steps."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview this week that he is willing to have Iran's nuclear experts meet with scientists from the United States and other world powers as a confidence-building measure.

Ahmadinejad insisted that Iran is using nuclear technology only for energy and medical purposes and has no interest in acquiring nuclear weapons. He said he wants to buy enriched uranium from the United States that would be used for medical purposes.

The nuclear material Iran is now producing is 3 percent to 5 percent enriched and suitable only for energy purposes. Nuclear material for medical purposes must be 20 percent enriched -- purchasing such material would require a waiver of international sanctions. While weapons-grade material is more than 90 percent enriched, making material for the medical reactor could put Iran on the next step to reaching that level.

In Tehran Friday, Iranian state television revealed the Sept. 21 letter on its Arabic language news channel, Al-Alam, which is often used to transmit important official Iranian foreign policy decisions. The report quoted an unnamed source who described the letter as further evidence of Tehran's transparency in dealing with the IAEA about its nuclear program. It repeated Iran's long-held assertion that it is acquiring nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,281 Posts
OK no, Iran didn't tell the truth, who would have ever thought. Now that we know Israel can relax! The threat to them is over. :blink:
What say you nobama?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Sigh...Israel is going to have to go it alone folks, how will it set with you when BO orders our troops to attack Israel?

We know its coming just how will it play out though...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,997 Posts
Sigh...Israel is going to have to go it alone folks, how will it set with you when BO orders our troops to attack Israel?

We know its coming just how will it play out though...
IMO, it's just the opposite. Here's my take:

1. Have it appear that Israel has to "go it alone".
2. So Israel "has" to attack Iran as a "defensive" move.
3. Iran & allies counter attack Israel.
4. We "have" help Israel & attack Iran.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Nice fantasy but they have already made it clear if Israeli planes fly over Iraq they would try to shoot them down.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,286 Posts
Wait a minute... wasn't it just last week that V.P. Biden was saying that we didn't need the missile shield in Europe because Iran no longer posed a nuclear threat to us our our allies????
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,875 Posts
Boy oh boy it's going to be nice when Iran has nukes. At that point there will be no more "stern words" or "negotiating" with them... or any other terrorist organization in the region. :cantlook:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,722 Posts
I want to know since they said they were aware of this in the Bush admin and Big O knew at the transition but they were waiting for intel to confirm so there was no error, was it really not confirmed until AFTER the oppurtunity to announce it during his UN speech , to Ahmadinejad's face. They really didn't get it confirmed until friday morning, when the govt was knocking off early and taking a holiday monday (everything is SOOOOO critical , but not critical enough not to goof off apparently) ? I think he did it this way precisely NOT to do it in the UN. Wonder why?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,997 Posts
Nice fantasy but they have already made it clear if Israeli planes fly over Iraq they would try to shoot them down.
I'll believe that if it happens. A fantasy would be us minding our own business for a change. You know, doing what is best for the US citizens.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,133 Posts
[
A fantasy would be us minding our own business for a change. You know, doing what is best for the US citizens.
[/quote]

+1...that would be nice...the government putting us citizens first on the 'help out' list.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Nice fantasy but they have already made it clear if Israeli planes fly over Iraq they would try to shoot them down.
I'll believe that if it happens. A fantasy would be us minding our own business for a change. You know, doing what is best for the US citizens.
Well that is the position of the Iraqi president who I am sure cleared the position with BO's people.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,875 Posts
Nice fantasy but they have already made it clear if Israeli planes fly over Iraq they would try to shoot them down.
I'll believe that if it happens. A fantasy would be us minding our own business for a change. You know, doing what is best for the US citizens.
Allowing Iran to become a nuclear armed state is not doing what is best for the US citizens.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top