Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Covered this WAY back in March when the ATF revoked their FFL for the 11th or 12th time.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Rerun

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Going for lucky 13?
Dunno, but their site only lists accessories right now. Unless I didn't look hard enough, which I will fully admit that I did not...

Their blog doesn't show any updates since losing their FFL officially in March.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
What for?
Being the 11th or 12th time they switched owners and FFL's to avoid prosecution... It's basically the same company with a new sibling, cousin, or other blood relative being the FFL under a new DBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taco Salad

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
This is almost an Alex Jones Show level conspiracy. With the ATF cracking down on so many gun issues, and an openly hostile anti-gun administration, how on earth does this company have another valid FFL if the frog-turning, shape-shifting, global elites aren't involved?
And in only 7 months since a very publicly announced loss of their FFL as JA Industries. I didn't know federal level appeals moved that quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumthum

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Yes, but in the article I posted from March they just have another person in the family start another LLC and file for the FFL, then d.b.a. it. Technically you can't get an FFL solely for personal use, with the C&R being the exception to the rule but which clearly states must only be used in furtherance of the holder's private collection. There has to be a proposed or intended business associated with the FFL and some states will actually require you to have a license for said home based business as the sole proprietor
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
I'm not sure how that would work. My guess would be that large companies like Ruger file for an FFL differently than smaller companies like JA.



This is what I would assume for smaller companies, an LLC (probably frequently a sole owner/proprietor) would file for the FFL and it would be tied back to that individual. I know you can tie an FFL to an address you don't own, would a company be able to own the factory with the tooling and an LLC be set up to operate the factory as a contractor? I'm thinking along the lines of how Lake City runs. Just a thought, but if the factory was owned by a third party and these various JA companies merely operated it, then it wouldn't effect the ownership or assets of the factory if JA was sued, or lost it's FFL and had to reform, etc. Kind of like an extra layer of legal shielding. I'm just trying to wrap my head around this entire thing.
If I am interpreting the rules and what happened to JA, et al correctly there is an LLC doing business as JA in its historical forms and as each LLC came under scrutiny or a lawsuit was filed, the original LLC filed for bankruptcy, a new one was started by a family member with a new FFL, and they took over JA as a new iteration of the same. Then the angry mom lady people and Bloomberg threw a shit ton of money at it, and bought all the existing stock from the last Jennings and had it all destroyed?

Now we have the latest version in JA Industries that the feds actually managed to get in to court and revoke the FFL of that somehow have an FFL again.

It's like the craziest game of 3 card Monty ever and even when the fed managed to find the queen JAI flipped the table and kept the money.

Edit: or would it be the shell game since we're taking shady business stuff? 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumthum

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
I was thinking more like Whack-a-mole; with exactly the same outcome for the same reasons. They keep trying to whack the current iteration of JA and another one pops up but the stupidly try again. It 's the definition of insanity. When the mad mommies et all bought the stock (which I only vaguely remember) I bet JA folks laughed themselves all the way to the bank then downed a couple of beers and started it all over again.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Hell the angry karunts buyout probably paid the lawyer's fees and funded the new JA's. I think I'm most impressed that the feds managed to get them in to court and revoke the FFL. I think that might be a sign of the increasingly anti-gun climate as @bumthum pointed out. A sympathetic judge and a hungry A-USA fast tracked the paperwork kind of thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lklawson

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Look at family in Louisiana that owns or owned Red Jacket they went through several employees to get ffls because non of them could get one.
As each one of them caught a DV or SO charge. I think Red Jacket was just code for needing to go in to PC as soon as you hit lockup.

I forgot about them, but somebody on this here forum donated a couple of red jacket mags to the Escape From NY fund.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Sooo, I did a bit of online poking about. Acording to the ATF online records the FFL is held by JA Industries LLC, 249 Elliot Rd, Henderson NV and the FFL mailing address leads directly to a residence owned by -wait for it-
Christine Jennis Jimenez & Juan Paul Jimenez Jr. Like father like son?
Right and the JAI from March was the 12th iteration since 1970 something and was owned by Paul Sr.

So yeah! This is lucky 13 and owned by Paul Jr.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
And in 5 years it will go under again. I'm probably being generous.
12 didn't even last two years! Started up again in 2020, investigated in 2021, FFL revoked in early 2022.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Don't mind him. I'm pretty sure he's the jackass that said he open carries a blinged out, unloaded 1911 to dare someone to try and snatch it from him so he can shoot them with his "real" carry piece.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
26,917 Posts
Legos are hardly bling, and I'm not daring anyone to snatch it. But it's not my primary. If you think OCing a Lego gripped 1911 makes me a jackass, who do you think ISN'T a jackass in your world?
Your words, not mine. You said that you open carry an unloaded firearm hoping someone snatches it so you can shoot them. You got raked over the coals for it too, and not just by me.
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top