I'm not sure how aware you guys are of this case. I mentioned it in an earlier thread, but its not really the place to discuss it. It has been an on going case for quite sometime. Lots of appeals and the standard controversial court rulings. NOTE: this all takes place after 1986 when the MG registry was closed. The basics are that Hollis filed a form 1 with the ATF to create an M16. It was approved much to the surprise of everyone. A stamp was issued and received. The M16 was manufactured. Then without warning and 0 due process. the BATFE revoked the stamp, and issued it as denied. They are challenging the legality, and constituionality (sp?, is that a word?) Of the total ban on post 86 samples. They have a lot of good points, and are meeting a lot of opposition from pro gun and anti alike. Most pro gun opposition are MG collectors that got in before the 86 ban and do not want there investments to drop from $20,000+ to $3,000 over night. If Hollis would win MG's would be regulated like suppressor's tax stamp and BG checks from the feds. a while back one of the attorneys did a question answer session on Reddit, and had some interesting discussion. Here is his opening statement. Link to post at the bottom. This is a case i would love to see be won. They claim that the ATF has issued post 86 stamps to a select few who have ties to the top. and they claim to have proof. that will play a part I'm sure. Links: to donate https://hellerfoundation.org/about/hollis-vs-holder/ Reddit AMA with the lawyer : https://www.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/38o77i/i_am_the_attorney_for_hollis_v_lynch_formerly/ If I missed anything let me know. also give me your opinions, I'm very curious what you guys think of this suit, the MG registry, and what you want to see happen.