[Raygam]

All right I'm looking for a new 9mm, at Buds they have both guns for $300. The Sigma has a $50 rebate so that's a plus. I have read the reviews on both. I was at the LGS today and I did dry fire the Sigma and I didn't think the trigger pull was that bad (I thought it was about the same as the C9). So all other reviews say they are both great guns. Does anyone have both? Does anyone carry (concealled) either gun or are they to bulky? I would like to have something to CC but cant do the sub compacts, my hands are to big for those guns. I also handled a PA63 and the web between by thumb and index finger is WAY to close to the slide for my comfort. Any other options out there in the 300 range?

Just for a size comparison I comfortably handled the Sigma, MP9, Glock 17, and a Taurus Mill Pro. How are they in comparison to the p95?

 

[keby]

I used to have a 1st generation sigma. New ones are a bit better looking and trigger pull is nicer. I have a P95 now. Between the two of those I would take my Ruger, I just like it better. It fits my hand well and trigger pull is much better. I don't conceal it yet, but I did just order a IWB holster for it. It won't be too bad for me to conceal but I am big enough to conceal a firearm that size. Go with which one fits you better, either way it won't be a bad choice.

 

[PA 995]

I also used to have a 1st generation Sigma. Trigger was absolutely horrible, but it was 100 percent reliable. I like the Ruger P series much better, and IMO they are great hanguns for the money. I have a P90 that ive shot many many rounds thru and the only ammo it dosen't like are light target loads with SWC's.