Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,376 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com.

Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity with many believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation?

The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers - and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very Democrat (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose driven agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative.

There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts...'proceed with caution.' Take what it says at facXXevalXXue and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Remember, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com
I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False...... Then they gave their Liberal slant....!!! I have suspected some problems with Snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder. www.truthorfiction.com is a far a better source for verification, in my opinion.

This couple is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to Youtube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not... trust Snopes.com ever for anything that is remotely political! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore. So goes modern journalism. There are cropping up numerous sites and blogs that openly challenging Snopes's findings, opinions, and outright claims.

A few conservative speakers on Myspace told me about Snopes a few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway. So you might consider thinking twice before relying on Snopes.com for fact checking and do your friends the courtesy of tipping them off to Snopes political slant.

Many people still think snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that is a hoax in itself.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,898 Posts
A lot of the stuff they are correct on. Most of the chain mail crap at least. But yeah I read a while back about who ran it. Got curious myself. No one is unbiased sadly.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,722 Posts
Let me get this straight..you checked up on snopes by using..wikipedia?? ROFLMFAO
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,376 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Let me get this straight..you checked up on snopes by using..wikipedia?? ROFLMFAO
Actually I didn't.
But I did find the article interesting as I have not trusted Snopes for some time.
I have found them to be slanted at times and even their sources are often of a certain point of view.

This was posted in order to perhaps make people do a bit of research on their own, before believing any one source.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
618 Posts
I would never consider Snoops the end all in the field of verification providers. However, they do squelch some of the more ridiculous rumors spread on the internet. Have I seen some bias in some areas? Sure I have. That's why I try to get multiple sources on the information that is IMPORTANT to me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
I am migrating to the position if I cant see their faces I don't buy what they are selling. It is difficult to lie well face to face and too easily done in writing.
 

·
U.S.S.
Joined
·
2,267 Posts
I am migrating to the position if I cant see their faces I don't buy what they are selling. It is difficult to lie well face to face and too easily done in writing.
I don't believe you . ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
I am migrating to the position if I cant see their faces I don't buy what they are selling. It is difficult to lie well face to face and too easily done in writing.
I don't believe you . ;)
Good man.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top