Now now now Rhodes, you need to speak in itty bitty words for the left wing to understand.
I guess that "Hope and Change" ain't workin out so good for em.
I guess that "Hope and Change" ain't workin out so good for em.
With one post you damn making these things party related in the next you do exactly that.Oh man, the nuclear option? no way. Thats just low. why, i remember when someone else threatened that a while ago....what was his name again? oh yeah Bill Frist.
I thought you knew by now that i can be incredibly inconsistent.With one post you damn making these things party related in the next you do exactly that.
well that wasn't clear to me....now it is.I dont damn the tactic only the clear disregard held for we the people. my my
So by "clear will of the people so well known and obvious" you mean those who oppose it, not a true "will of the people" which would entail pretty much total unification of the people. This health care debate is not that clear cut, there are quite a few supporters and quite a few detractors, this does not equal clear will of the people.With one post you damn making these things party related in the next you do exactly that.
So tell me what issue was it that had the clear will of the people so well known and obvious that that will was strongly against the legislation in question? I dont damn the tactic only the clear disregard held for we the people. my my
Yes, health care reform was a reason I pulled the lever for him. This "we" you speak of Rhodes, it does not include everyone, there are quite a few people who want it to happen, thus it can not be construed as a "clear will of the people."LS EVERY indicator is saying the same thing, we dont want this to occur. Like it or not it. Now ask then why did people vote for Obama....hell I have no idea the motive since this is exactly what he said he would do.
ratcheta-ratcheta-ratchetaNow it could change eventually but when has the government ever given up power?