Joined
·
761 Posts
I would settle for either my .45s the Kimber, or JHP for short work.... for long and even relative short range a Mini 14, Mini 30, or M1a would put me in HEAVEN and those in the cross hairs in hell. JMHO!
It is preferred that you can reach out and touch the threat before they can tag you. In any situation that rifle will be easier to control especially with shaking hands (not the movie shaking you see sometimes but that low amplitude high frequency shaking that come from adrenaline). As for knowing what will happen when the fire goes goes both ways it all depends on training and you always wish you had more.i hope people remember when they are talking about how accurate they can shoot and what theyre rifle can do----
nobody is shooting back at them--just saying
Hmmm....pics.More braging then anything else but this seemed like a great place to post this, but I shot a sub MOA group with my Tech-sight equiped WASR-10 today, so I think my 7.62x69 is acceptable for accuracy in my book. One thing that should be added to the discusion is range and location. By that I mean if you live in a more open area a higher power higher velocity round would be benificial. If you live in a heavily woodedarea with a lot of brush, as I do, you should make sure your chosen round performs well in brush. If you live in a city range may not be an option and a 9mm carbine could be just the ticket.
What about a Ruger M77 Hawkeye scout? tough dependable and they can be modified to take an M1A mag.My lineup is a Remington 870 12 gauge, 2 Glock 19's, Kahr PM9 and quite possibly real soon, a new Mini 14 tactical with the thicker shorter barrel. Should be accurate enough, I live in the suburbs and don't forsee longer range shooting beyond 75 yards actually.
Perhaps an AK, but too heavy for me when loaded with 30 rounds. I want something light and very maneuverable. I might opt for a Marlin 1894 in .44magnum though.