Hi-Point Firearms Forums banner

Same old questions on a new Ruger PC 9mm carbine...

3.5K views 42 replies 10 participants last post by  undeRGRound  
#1 ·
Finding the same old answers, so thought I'd come home and just get the best available info 🤷‍♂️

"Is it +p rated" and I haven't seen anywhere that is stated, but one does see all the usual Yada-yada bs saying "it should handle it, Ruger has a good warranty, don't run a steady diet" and so forth.
So I'm fairly certain it's not officially rated +P but as some may know, I have a rather large store of 9mm NATO which works well in my experience, and provided that this firearm is like most out there, I will shoot NATO in this carbine. IMO it is the poor man's +P and I like the sealed bullets and primers. Long storage capable FOR THE WIN!!!
 
#2 ·
#3 ·
I saw a truncated version of that exact passage, on a ruger forum 🤡
Didn't mention the +p but then again, it was simply a reply on a forum. +P capable is awesome 👌

I'll have no problem at all running the NATO.
 
#6 ·
Remember…being called NATO doesn’t make it NATO, nor does actually BEING NATO spec make it +P.

The NATO spec is for velocity, not pressure. It can include 115 or 124 grain bullets, too.
 
#7 ·
Remember....he's been told this no less than a dozen times and doesn't give a fuck because he's convinced NATO is +p...
 
#16 ·
One of the downsides to 124 grn 9x19mm ammo is that it goes subsonic before 50 yds, hence the Army pistol team switched to 147 grn from the 4.9" bbl Berettas as the bullet never entered transsonic instability. Not a problem from a 16" carbine, of course - I think I worked out in Kuwait at 120 degree temps, I would need a 12.5" bbl to keep 124 supersonic to 50 yds. This may be why the Army switched to the 115 grn round w/ the SIG 320.
 
#31 ·
Here's a question for AL and anyone else, but @ajole always has good input on this...

Thinking about a Scope for these here Ruger PCCs and wondering if a BDC is worth the extra $$ or what.